But look at other free emulation software, most will never be so good sourced, this is not a historical article about some personality.

Woodroar ( talk) 18:07, (UTC) I understand that the sourcing is far from perfect. Again, we should leave it up to independent, reliable sources to guide our writing, not what we or the developer(s) consider important. Instead of summarizing what the source says, we're referencing the source but instead taking claims from the linked videos. And beyond those issues, we're not even using the trivial coverage from otherwise reliable sources correctly.

Software features and highlights should always be supported by independent, reliable sources. Sure, we can sometimes use those, but we shouldn't base the bulk of articles on them ( WP:PRIMARY) and they should never be used to support self-serving claims ( WP:ABOUTSELF). Virtually every claim in the article is referenced to a primary source. We need articles about the subject and coverage that is significant and independent and from reliable sources, not simply sharing a video or a Reddit post. Jirka.h23 ( talk) 13:34, (UTC) You added an ecommerce site's blog and an SEO/affiliate churnalism site's blog, neither of which are reliable, nor are they significant coverage.

Maybe you could identify the claims in article, that need a citation. Woodroar ( talk) 12:27, (UTC) I added two sources to the introduction. I've tagged the article for notability to see if anyone else can find substantial coverage. This falls far short of 'significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject' as required by WP:GNG, to the point where I doubt this article would survive a deletion discussion. (Some don't even mention Xenia at all!) Most of the article is supported by primary sources. The sourced mentioned at the top of this page are similarly trivial, mostly mentioning Xenia in passing. Spazio Games is a single paragraph, again with no substantive details. PC Gamer is the same, but possibly even worse because those three paragraphs say basically the same thing. Jirka.h23 ( talk) 05:10, (UTC) Is it? Polygon is a few paragraphs with no substantive details. This page was proposed for deletion by Woodroar ( talk contribs) 11:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC) agreed, how does one go about flagging for deletion/rewrite? 174.3.218.23 ( talk) 05:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC).Check out the article for a similar subject, RPCS3, for comparison and the realization that this is one of the worst articles on the site. It reads like someone commenting after hearing of the subject's existence. Dudes, this article is really dogshit and provides no real information.

Xenia emulator download directx 11